"HSE Experts Propose '嚇阻' the West with Nuclear Strikes on Uninhabited Territories"

Background

The Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Russia has generated controversy with a proposal to deter the West by conducting nuclear strikes on uninhabited areas.

Rationale for the Proposal

The proposal, put forth by HSE Associate Professor Alexander Dynkin, argues that the threat of nuclear retaliation would deter Western countries from intervening in Russia's affairs.

Dynkin maintains that Russia should consider adopting a "no-first-use" policy, but only if it is coupled with the threat of nuclear strikes on uninhabited areas.

Assessment of the Proposal

The proposal has drawn criticism from both within Russia and internationally.

Domestic Criticisms

Several Russian experts have expressed concerns about the legality and morality of the proposal.

They argue that it violates international law and could lead to nuclear escalation.

International Condemnation

The proposal has also been widely condemned by Western leaders.

US President Joe Biden has called the suggestion "irresponsible and dangerous."

Implications for Nuclear Deterrence

The HSE proposal raises questions about the future of nuclear deterrence.

Evolving Nuclear Doctrines

Traditional nuclear deterrence strategies have relied on the threat of mutually assured destruction (MAD).

The HSE proposal suggests a shift towards a more proactive approach, where nuclear threats are used to prevent conflict rather than simply retaliate.

Risks of Nuclear Escalation

Critics argue that the HSE proposal could increase the risk of nuclear escalation by lowering the threshold for nuclear use.

They fear that it could lead to a situation where miscalculations or misunderstandings trigger a nuclear exchange.

Conclusion

The HSE proposal to "scare" the West with nuclear strikes on uninhabited areas is a controversial and potentially dangerous idea.

It raises serious questions about the morality, legality, and strategic implications of nuclear deterrence.